← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12760/2020disposed of

Thirunavukarasu v. The Sub Divisional Magistrate Cum

2020-11-10Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

Crl.O.P(MD)No.12760 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P(MD)No.12760 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.5837 of 2020 Thirunavukarasu ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Sub-Divisional Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Perunazhi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned proceedings of the first respondent in M.C.No.03/2020, dated 28.02.2020 and to quash the same.

For Petitioner :

Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthik For Respondents :

Ms.S.E.Veronica Vincent, Government Advocate.

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner challenges the impugned notice issued under Section 111 of Cr.P.C.

3.Section 111 of Cr.P.C., reads as under:- "When a Magistrate acting under section 107, section 108, section 109 or section 110, deems it necessary to require any person to show cause under such section he shall make an order in writing, setting forth the substance of the information received, the amount of the bond to be executed, the term for which it is to be in force, and the number, character and class of sureties (if any) required."

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P(MD)No.12760 of 2020 3.A mere reading of the impugned notice would indicate that the particulars required to be set out have not at all been set out. Therefore, on this sole ground, the impugned notice is quashed. The Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) das NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To:- 1.The Sub-Divisional Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Perunazhi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.M.S. JEYAKARTHIK, Advocate ( SR-21878[F] dated 11/11/2020 ) Crl.O.P(MD)No.12760 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.5837 of 2020 10.11.2020 VR(CO) AP(24/11/2020) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2