Sam Victor Gnanamuthu v. State Rep By Its

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.07.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Sam Victor Gnanamuthu

...Petitioner

Vs.

State Rep. by its:- 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.

2.The Inspector of Police, South Police Station, Tuticorin District.

3.The Manager, Sriram City Union Finance Ltd., Tuticorin.

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein to take appropriate action against the third respondent and his agent on the basis of the petitioner's complaint, dated 13.07.2022 within a stipulated time period in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Maheswaran For R1 - R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (crl.side) 1 / 4

ORDER

This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein to take appropriate action against the third respondent and his agent on the basis of the petitioner's complaint, dated 13.07.2022. 2.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the respondent police is ready to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 13.07.2022. 3.Recording the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), the second respondent is hereby directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 13.07.2022 and to take suitable action on merits.

4.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

21.07.2022 vsd 2 / 4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.

2.The Inspector of Police, South Police Station, Tuticorin District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3 / 4

V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

vsd 21.07.2022 4 / 4