Madras High CourtWP(MD)/13407/2016disposed of

M.Muthuraj v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2016-07-28Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.07.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA W.P(MD)No.13407 of 2016 M.Muthuraj ... Petitioner -vs1.The Superintendent of Police Theni District 2.The Inspector of Police P.C.Patti Police Station Theni District 3.Murugan 4.Pandi 5.Chinnamuthuvel 6.Chinnaraj 7.Kumar ... Respondents Prayer:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.03.2016 given in person before the 2nd respondent and thereby directing him to provide the police protection to the petitioner's life and limb and his family from the continuous life threat given by the respondents 3 to 7. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sankaranarayanan For Respondents : Mr.D.Muruganandham Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 and R2

O R D E R

The writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.03.2016 given in person before the 2nd respondent and thereby directing him to provide the police protection to the petitioner's life and limb and his family from the continuous life threat given by the respondents 3 to 7. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Mr.D.Muruganandham, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that as per the representation dated 10.03.2016, the respondents are not conducting any enquiry. He would further submit that even after measurement of the property by qualified and competent surveyor, instead of approaching the competent civil Court, the respondents 3 to 7 are causing interference. Therefore, the respondents may be directed to consider the representation.

5.Under such circumstances, the 2nd respondent police is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.03.2016 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

This writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police Theni District 2.The Inspector of Police P.C.Patti Police Station Theni District +One cc to Mr.V.Sankaranarayanan, Advocate, SR.No.40939 +One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.40207 RR RL/5C/2P/DB/8/8/2016 ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.13407 of 2016 28.07.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/