A.Saravana Prasanth v. P.Muthu Ramalingam

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of August Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM IN CRL OP(MD) No.9590 of 2019 1 A.SARAVANA PRASANTH 2 U.D.RAJAMMA, 3 N.UTHANDA KUMAR, 4 U.VASANTHI, 5 A.VIJAYAKUMAR, 6 A.CHANDRAPANDIAN 7 J.VIJAYALAKSHMI, 8 S.SELVARAJ, 9 N.KANDASAMY 10 UMA MAHESWARI, 11 INDIRANI KRISHNAMOORTHI, 12 V.SHANMUGARAJA, 13 R.SHANTHI, 14 S.ANANDHARAJ, 15 R.AWINASH RAJ, 16 S.THAMIL SELVI, 17 N.RADHA, 18 N.ARUN YADHAV 19 R.MARY, 20 R.JOTHI ANTHONY, 21 R.PANDIYAMMAL, 22 B.DINESH BALU, 23 T.KARUPPASAMY, 24 K.VEERAPANDIAN, 25 S.SENTHAMARAIKANNAN, 26 S.GANESAN, 27 T.THIRUPATHI, 28 S.BRINDHA 29 B.THIRULOGASUNDAR, 30 A.SEENI THAMBI, 31 N.ABUSHALI, 32 R.RAMA SUBBU, 33 K.PALANIKUMAR, 34 B.VIDHYA, 35 P.SHALINI, 36 P.SONAI, 37 PARIMALADEVI, 1/4

38 HEMALATHA, 39 MALLIGA, 40 MALAIYARASI, 41 K.PANCHAVARNAM, 42 G.IRUDHAYARAJ, 43 P.RATCHANA, 44 A.RADHA, 45 K.THAMIM ANSARI, 46 SARA BEEVI, 47 K.SATHISH KUMAR, 48 M.MUTHU KAMALAM, 49 A.G.KESAVAN, 50 Y.RAJAKUMAR, 51 R.JEYANTHI, 52 K.CHANDRA MOHAN 53 A.NILOFER NISHA 54 RAJARAJESWARI 55 P.MUTHUKRISHNAN 56 V.GNANAPANDITHAN 57 V.MADHAVAN 58 A.SHANTHI 59 C.ARUMUGAM 60 M.SOUNDARAPANDIAN 61 B.SUGANTHI 62 P.VALARMATHI 63 I.PADMA 64 G.MUTHUKUMARAVEL 65 ABDULLAH 66 P.SURESH KUMAR 67 VIJAYALAKSHMI 68 A.PRAKASH 69 A.ANNALAKSHMI 70 R.RAMACHANDRAN 71 T.CHANDRASEGARAN 72 N.MUTHURAMALINGAM 73 G.DEVAKI 74 A.PANDEESWARI 75 KOKILA 76 C.PRADEEPA 77 S.PADMANABAN 78 N.SHANTHI 79 S.PAUL PACKKIYAM 80 R.RAJESHWARI 81 V.S.SUNDARAPANDIAN 82 U.CHARUMATHI 83 S.MALARKODI 84 S.MALARVIZHI 85 J.KARTHICK 86 K.GURU MARIAPPAN 87 SARANYA 2/4

88 R.KANAGARAJ 89 R.KAMATCHI PANDI 90 N.PANDI SELVI 91 A.BHARATHI 92 S.MADHUMITHA 93 A.MOHANA 94 M.MANO 95 R.VERGINI 96 R.KARTHIGA DEVI 97 BABU DHARMABALAN 98 B.RAVIKUMAR ... PETITIONERS/INTERVENIG PETITIONERS Vs 1 P.MUTHURAMALINGAM 2 M.BHARATHI ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS 1 AND 2 3.STATE REP THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE EOW, TRICHY CRIME NO.2 OF 2019 ... 3RD RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to permit the petitioners to intervene in the Crl.OP(MD) No.9590/2019.

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.M.AARUMUGAM, Advocate for the petitioners and of Mr.R.RAMASAMY, Advocate for R1, R2 and Mr.V.NEELAKANDAN, Additional Public Prosecutor for R3, the court made the following order:- The learned Counsel for the intervenor seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.In view of the submissions and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the Intervenor, this Intervene Application is dismissed as withdrawn.

sd/- 20/08/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S-II) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

3/4

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE EOW, TRICHY.

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN IN CRL OP(MD) No.9590 of 2019 Date :20/08/2019 TK/VR/SAR.2/22.08.2019/4P/3C 4/4