Pachaiperumal v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19/07/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM CRL OP(MD). No.10085 of 2019 Pachaiperumal, ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Kovilankulam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.
Crime No.44/2019.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.G.Vishnuram, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.V.Neelakandan, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 44 of 2019 on the file of the Respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 323 & Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002,in Crime No.44 of 2019, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Heard both sides.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that due to family dispute, the defacto complainant, who is the brother's wife of the petitioner lodged a false complaint against the petitioner. He further submitted that even though it is stated in the FIR that the petitioner has assaulted the defacto complainant with hands, she was not sent to hospital and therefore, he prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has fairly conceded that the defacto complainant was not sent to hospital. However, he opposed this petition as investigation is still pending. 5.Taking into consideration of the fact that the defacto complainant is the brother's wife of the petitioner and also the fact that the defacto complainant was not sent to hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(i) If the petitioner fail to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days, this order shall stand automatically cancelled.
(ii) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required before the respondent police for interrogation.
(iii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
(iv) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. (vi) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 19/07/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KAMUTHI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
2 DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVILANKULAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to MR.G.VISHNURAM, Advocate ( SR-12125[I] dated 23/07/2019 )
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.10085 of 2019 Date :19/07/2019 dss AE/VR/SAR-I (25.07.2019) 3P 6C