Rajagobal v. The State Rep. By The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.07.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Rajagobal

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The State Rep. by The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi.

3.Samuvel Jebakuar

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to conduct enquiry and initiate appropriate action against the third respondent by considering the petitioner's complaint dated 05.05.2022.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vishnuvardhan For R1 - R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) 1 / 4

ORDER

This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to take appropriate action against the third respondent on the basis of the petitioner's complaint, dated 05.05.2022.

2.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the respondent police is ready to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 05.05.2022. 3.Recording the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), the second respondent is hereby directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.05.2022 and to take suitable action on merits within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

2 / 4

4.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

21.07.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No vsd To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3 / 4

V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

vsd 21.07.2022 4 / 4