Vignesh v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.07.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Vignesh

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o the Superintendent of Police, Subarmaniyapuram, Trichirappalli District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o the Superintendent of Police, Musiri, Trichirappalli District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Trichy District.

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission and provide police protection to conduct 'Kabaadi' tournament on 23.07.2022 and 24.07.2022, which will be conducted at the ground situated in Government School, Nachampatti, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 15.07.2022.

1/5

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manojkumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthikumar Government Advocate (crl.side)

O R D E R

This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission and provide police protection to conduct 'Kabaadi' tournament on 23.07.2022 and 24.07.2022 at Government School, Nachampatti, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 15.07.2022.

2.Mr.M.Sakthikumar, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that 'Kabadi' tournament at Government School, Nachampatti, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District is going to be held on 23.07.2022 and 24.07.2022. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a tournament, they sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 15.07.2022. 2/5

But the respondent police has not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.

4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the respondent police has received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.

5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police.

6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019 dated 09.04.2019 along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the third respondent police is hereby directed 3/5

to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.07.2022 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular.

7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

21.07.2022 Index :Yes/No vsd Note: Issue Order Copy on 21.07.2022 To 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o the Superintendent of Police, Subarmaniyapuram, Trichirappalli District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o the Superintendent of Police, Musiri, Trichirappalli District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Trichy District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

V.SIVAGNANAM., J vsd 21.07.2022 5/5