Muneeswaran, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Fifth day of September Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.16334 of 2018 MUNEESWARAN, ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED-3 Vs STATE REP.BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.497/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.B.SANTHANAM RAJESHKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.M.ANANTHA DEVI, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 394 of IPC, in Crime No.497 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused person with other two accused persons snatched the chain from the defacto complainant.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side).

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner is having two previous https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ cases similar in nature.

5.Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

sd/- 25/09/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to MR.B.SANTHANAM RAJESHKUMAR Advocate SR.No.18447

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16334 of 2018 Date :25/09/2018 TM AE/PN/SAR2/28.09.2018/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/