S.Chandrasekaran v. The Tamil Nadu State

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.08.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P(MD).No.13972 of 2016 S.Chandrasekaran ...

Petitioner Vs 1.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd, rep.by its Managing Director, New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd, Karaikudi Region, Sivagangai District.

3.The Administrative Officer, The Tamil Nadu State Transport , Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvallur Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-02.

...

Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to revise the pension of the petitioner as per the 4th benefit with retrospective effect from 01.09.2010 in terms of Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.61 Transport (C) Department dated 30.04.2015 and as per settlement dated 22.01.2011 based on the representation of the petitioner dated 25.06.2015 and 19.09.2015. For petitioner : M/s.S.Sivanesan For respondents : Mr.D.Sivaraman

ORDER

The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents have not given the benefits both under the Settlement

and as per the Government Order. In this regard, the petitioner has given a representation to the respondents. Since the said representation did not evoke any response, the petitioner is before this Court.

3. At this juncture, learned Standing Counsel for the Transport Corporation, after taking notice for the respondents, submitted that in similar circumstances, this Court, in W.P.(MD). No.4829 of 2016, dated 10.03.2016, has directed the respondents therein to consider the representations of the petitioners therein. Therefore, he submitted that similar directions may be issued to these petitioners also.

4.

In view of the above, the respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, on merits and in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is also directed to enclose a copy of this order along with the representation already sent to the respondents, for further follow up, in this regard.

5.

With the above direction, all the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar ssm +1cc to M/S D.SIVARAMAN, Advocate in SR.No. 42092 +1cc to M/S S.S.Sivanesan,Advocate in SR.No. 42298 JAM/11.08.2016/KP/ 2P-3C W.P(MD).No.13972 of 2016 04.08.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/