Malliga v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10/11/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM CRL OP(MD). No.12802 of 2020

1. Malliga

2. Malarvizhi

3. Jayasing

4. Raja

5. Moosa Nainar ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 5 Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

(Crime No.16 of 2020) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.T.Vadivelan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.16 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners who arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 5 apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under sections 120(B), 406, 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471 and 472 IPC in Crime No.16 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) made a submission that the petitioners along with other accused created forged documents in order to grab the property by registering document and submitted the said forged documents before the Court of law. Further, the investigation are in progress. A1 is arrested. Thus, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the present petition against A1 is not entertainable. As far as the other petitioners are concerned, it is not preferable to release on anticipatory bail.

3.In view of the fact that the forged document are being investigated by the respondents police and there is a possibility of tampering the documents or witnesses. Thus, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

sd/- 10/11/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, THOOTHUKUDI.

2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12802 of 2020 Date :10/11/2020 RMK TE/AKM/SAR-III : 23/11/2020 : 2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/