Suresh v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Melur

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06/05/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Suresh ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By, The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Madurai District.

Cr.No.129/2026.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunkumar Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PRAYER :- C-6B For Bail in Crime No.129/2026 on the file of the respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.03.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 49, 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) and 103(1) of BNS,2023, in Crime No.129 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to a quarrel regarding the handing over of accounts of Draupadi Amman Temple between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, the petitioner and other accused persons assaulted the defacto complainant and his younger brother consecutively and caused severe injuries on his right eye, head and face and also criminally intimidated them. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 11.03.2026. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

2/6

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there are totally 12 accused in this case. Due to a dispute regarding the temple accounts the accused persons assaulted the defacto complainant and his younger brother using wooden log and injured has been discharged from hospital. However, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner and considering the age of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, and on further conditions that :- 3/6

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is 4/6

released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(S S Y J) 06.05.2026 PJL TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Melur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Madurai District.

3. The Superintendent, District Prison, Dindigul.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J PJL

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9236 of 2026 Date : 06/05/2026 6/6