M.Paramasivam v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sattur Town
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 06/05/2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY M.Paramasivam ... Petitioner/ A1 Vs State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sattur Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
... Respondent PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :
For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.237 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Subramanian For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl. side)
ORDER
The petitioner/A1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 338, 336 and 340 of BNS, in 1/6
connection with the case in Crime No.237 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant had given a house for rent to the petitioner in the year 2022. At that time, no rental agreement has been executed. When the defacto complainant requested the petitioner to vacate the house, but, he sought one year time. However, the petitioner created a false rental agreement. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
2/6
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) opposed this petition stating that the petitioner is having six previous cases.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Sattur, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready and on further conditions that:
[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure 3/6
their identity;
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of 30 days and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.
[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.
06.05.2026 ogy 4/6
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Sattur.
2. The Inspector of Police, Sattur Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
S.SRIMATHY,J.
ogy
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.9181 of 2026 Date : 06/05/2026 6/6