Madras High CourtWP(MD)/3353/2017partly allowed

P.Karuppasamy v. The Superintendent Of Police

2017-02-27Honourable Mr Justice P. Kalaiyarasan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.02.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN W.P(MD) No.3353 of 2017 P.Karuppasamy ... Petitioner -vs1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Vanniyampatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the rejection order of the 2nd respondent on 21.02.2017 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant permission and protection for Adal Padal program in connection with Maasi Thiruvizha scheduled to be held on 11.03.2017 at Arulmigu Sri Pethanatchiamman Thirukovil at Enam Karisalkulam, South Street, Padikkasuvaithanpatti, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karthic Rajan For Respondents : Mr.D.Muruganandam Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the rejection order passed by the second respondent on 21.02.2017 and quash the same by way of issuing a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus.

2.Mr.D.Muruganandam, learned Additional Government Pleader has taken notice for the respondents.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.It is seen from order dated 21.02.2017 that the permission sought by the petitioner has been rejected only on the basis of law and order problem. The reason given by the second

respondent cannot be accepted. Under the said circumstances, this Court is inclined to pass the following order: 4.In fine, this Writ Petition is allowed in part without cost. The impugned order dated 21.02.2017 passed by the second respondent is quashed. The second respondent is directed to look into the representation alleged to have been given by the petitioner and dispose of the same within a period of two days. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(CS-II) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Vanniyampatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

+1 CC TO MR. R.KARTHIC RAJAN, ADVOCATE, SR NO.10739 +1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR NO.11145 mj MAS/SKN/SAR1:06.03.2017:2P/5C W.P(MD) No.3353 of 2017 27.02.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/