← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15504/2020allowed

Kathiravan v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-12-23Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15504 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15504 of 2020 1.Kathiravan 2.A.Mohammed Sabeek (Wrongly Mentioned in FIR as Asmeer Magan) 3.Balamurugan 4.Jeyaraman ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4 vs.

1.The Inspector of Police, Melavalavu Police Station, Melur, Madurai.

(Crime No.1173 of 2020) ...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Muneeswaran ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.1173 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent No.1 dated 14.10.2020 and quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioners : Mr.G.Karthik For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for records relating to the FIR in Crime No.1173 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.

2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioners/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the case and therefore, the petitioners would pray for quashing the FIR in Crime No.1173 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent. 3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally present before this Court today(23.12.2020) and the defacto complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15504 of 2020 been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the FIR in Crime No.1173 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent No.1, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Encl:Xerox copy of joint compromise memo VRN Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

To 1)The Inspector of Police, Melavalavu Police Station, Melur, Madurai.

2)The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 cc to Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, Advocate SR.No.27168 ORDER MADE IN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15504 of 2020 DATED : 23.12.2020 KM (06.01.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2