Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/13059/2020allowed

Pandiammal v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-11-19Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

C rl.O.P.(MD)No.13059 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13059 of 2020 1.Pandiammal 2.Muthupandi 3.Ganesan 4.Muniyandi 5.Thangapandi 6.Seenu ... Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 to 6 Vs.

1.State represented by The Inspector of Police Nathampatti Police Station Virudhunagar District (In Crime No.32 of 2020) ...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Karunakaran ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the entire records connected to the impugned First Information Report in Crime No.32 of 2020 pending on the file of the first respondent and quash the same against the petitioners. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For R-1 : Mr.R.Srinivasan Government Advocate For R2 `` : Mr.R.Karunanidhi

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned First Information Report registered in Crime No.32 of 2020 for the offence under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) I.P.C pending on the file of the first respondent and quash the same against the petitioners. 2.The second respondent / defacto complainant as well as the petitioners/accused 1 to 6 are present before this Court through video conference and they are identified by their respective learned counsels and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter in issue between them has been amicably resolved and therefore, the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the case and therefore, would pray for quashing the F.I.R. in Crime No.32 of 2020.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C rl.O.P.(MD)No.13059 of 2020 3.The joint compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties are also present personally along with their respective counsels and the learned Government Advocate would state that he has verified their identity.

4. In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the F.I.R in Crime No.32 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent police is quashed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CSI) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) msa Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

Encl:Xerox copy of Joint Compromise Memo To 1.The Inspector of Police Nathampatti Police Station Virudhunagar District 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13059 of 2020 19.11.2020 SJ(CO) KB(27.11.2020) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2