← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/16333/2020disposed of

Jayashree N.Patel v. The Thasildar

2020-11-19Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

W.P.(MD) No.16333 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD)No.16333 of 2020 Jayashree N.Patel ... Petitioner Vs.

The Tahsildar, Trichy West Taluk Trichy District.

... Respondent PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner based on the representation dated 04.11.2020 within a stipulated time to be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Mohan Gandhi For Respondents : Mr.M.Pandiarajan Addl. Government Advocate

O R D E R

The present writ petition has been filed for a mandamus to direct the respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner based on the representation dated 04.11.2020 within a stipulated time to be fixed by this Court.

2.It is the case of the petitioner that she is in possession and enjoyment of the property in S.Nos.79/1, 79/2 and 80/2 to an extent of 1.28, 1.03 and 2.63 respectively, which were gifted by her father. While so, for change of patta, the petitioner approached the respondent through representation dated 11.09.2020. Since the said representation has not been considered, she sent a reminder on 04.11.2020. Since no action is forthcoming from the respondent, the petitioner is before this Court with this writ petition. 3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that he received a communication from one K.Ramesh, dated 18.11.2020 stating that the land belongs to the Government.

However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not received any communication from the learned Additional Government Pleader. 4.Therefore, the learned Additional Government Pleader is expected to forward a copy of the communication dated 18.11.2020 to the learned counsel for the petitioner in order to enable the petitioner to take steps to proceed further, if she is not satisfied with the orders passed by the authority.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD) No.16333 of 2020

5. The writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent to communicate the order passed by him within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, enabling the petitioner to take steps to proceed further. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) RR Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To:

The Tahsildar, Trichy West Taluk Trichy District.

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-22392[F] dated 20/11/2020 ) +1 CC to M/s.S.M.MOHAN GANDHI, Advocate ( SR-22254[F] dated 20/11/2020 ) W.P.(MD)No.16333 of 2020 19.11.2020 CK(CO) KB(09.12.2020) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2