← Library
Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/624/2026

Mohamed Ali v. The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep By The Superintendent Of Police

2026-06-10Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh,Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.06.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN H.C.P.(MD)No.624 of 2026 Mohamed Ali .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kenikkarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3.Naveen Prasath .. Respondents Prayer :Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to secure the detenu and produce the body or person of the detenu, viz., M.Pousiyabanu, d/o. Mohamed Ali, aged 20 years before this Court, illegally detained by the third respondent and set her at liberty forthwith.

For Petitioner : Ms.X.Sumalatha For Respondents : Mr.D.Venkatesh Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu, (Criminal Side)

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed for a direction to the first and second respondents to produce the body or person of the detenue, who is the daughter of the petitioner and to set her at liberty.

2. Heard the learned counsel on either side.

3. The case of the petitioner is that the detenue is his younger daughter. All of a sudden, she went missing on 06.05.2026 and in spite of the best efforts, the whereabouts of the detenue was not able to be ascertained. Hence, a complaint was given before the second respondent, based on which, a woman missing FIR came to be registered in Crime No.222 of 2026. Since no effective steps were taken to find the whereabouts of the detenue and the petitioner suspected that the detenue is in the illegal custody of the third respondent, the present petition has been filed before this Court.

4. The learned counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) on instructions submitted that the detenue got married to the third respondent and they are presently residing at Kaveripattinam, Krishnagiri District. In fact, they have also given a complaint before the Kaveripattinam Police Station seeking for police protection and the same is pending. The relevant records were also placed before this Court.

5. On carefully going through the complaint given by the detenue, it is seen that she wants to continue to live with the third respondent and she is not interested to go along with the petitioner.

6. In the light of the above development, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition.

7. Recording the above, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed. (N.A.V.,J..) (K.K.R.K.,J.,) 10.06.2026 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No TSG

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kenikkarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.

AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J.

TSG H.C.P.(MD)No.624 of 2026 10.06.2026