← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/10247/2019dismissed

Karunanithi v. The Inspector Of Police

2019-08-14Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.10247 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 14/08/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM CRL OP(MD). No.10247 of 2019 Karunanithi, ... Petitioner/Accused rank not known Vs State rep by The Inspector of Police, Thiruchuli Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

Crime No. 185 of 2019.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.P.Prabhu, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.Ohmchairma Prabhu, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 185 of 2019 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/ accused no.5, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 379 of IPC and Section 21(1)of Mines and Minerals Act, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Heard both sides.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.10247 of 2019 this case. He further submitted that as per the FIR, the petitioner herein has illegally transported six units of river sand and hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner along with other had illegally transported six units of river sand. He further submitted that ten previous cases are pending against the petitioner, out of which eight cases relating to illegal sand mining. Hence he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of the aforesaid facts and also the submission of the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) that ten previous cases are pending against the petitioner, out of which eight cases relating to illegal sand mining, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Hence the anticipatory bail petition is dismissed. sd/- 14/08/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUCHULI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10247 of 2019 Date :14/08/2019 KM/PN/SAR-II (21.08.2019) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2