← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9451/2026granted

D.Karuppasamy v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sholavandan

2026-06-02Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal8 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 02/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL D.Karuppasamy, S/o. Duraipandi, 3/37, East Street, Kattakulam, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District..

... Petitioner/A2 Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep bym, The Inspector of Police, Sholavandan Police Station, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District.

(Cr.No. 99/2026).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr. N.Arjunkumar, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS 1/8

PRAYER :- C-8B. For Bail in Crime No. 99 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A2, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.04.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 109 and 324(4) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3 of the Explosive Substance Act, in Crime No.99 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that, due to previous enmity, on 18.04.2026, at about 1.00 a.m., the petitioner, along with the other accused persons, threw a petrol bomb at the entrance of the defacto complainant's house in order to threaten the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

2/8

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he is no way connected in the above said incident. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.04.2026. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.

Side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that investigation is still pending. He would further submit that the petitioner has no previous cases and no one sustained any injury. However, he vehemently, opposed to grant of bail.

5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

3/8

6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, nature of offence, and considering the fact that the petitioner has no previous cases and the material part of the investigation might have been completed and also considering the fact that no one sustained any injury and the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner from 18.04.2026, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Vadipatti, Madurai, and on further conditions that:

[b] the petitioner shall report before 4/8

the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which she is suspected;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the 5/8

conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(P D B J) 02.06.2026 VSG 6/8

TO 1.The learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Vadipatti, Madurai.

2.The Superintendent, District Jail, Theni.

3.The Inspector of Police, Sholavandan Police Station, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

7/8

P. DHANABAL,J., vsg

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9451 of 2026 Date : 02/06/2026 8/8