Madras High CourtWP(MD)/41/2017withdrawn dismissed

K.Rajaguru, S/O.Kamatchi v. The District Collector,

2017-01-03Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE) DATED 17.04.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Rev.Aplw(MD) No.41 of 2017 and WMP(MD)10152/2017 in W.P.(MD)No.10545 of 2017 & W.M.P.(MD)No.4349 of 2018 P.Manikandan ..

Review Petitioner / 4th Respondent Vs.

1.Ramesh .. 1st Respondent/Petitioner 2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable Television Corporation Limited, 34/123, 6th Floor, Durgar Tower, Marshal Road, Egmore, Chennai.

3.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

4.The Special Tahsildar / Deputy Manager, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable Television Corporation Limited, Dindigul District.

Respondents 2 to 4 / Respondents 1 to 3 Prayer:- Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code to review the order dated 07.06.2017 made in W.P.(MD)No.10545 of 2017.

Prayer in WP(MD). 10545/ 2017 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to appoint a person incharge to the Dindigul Cable TV operators Control room in respect of the Tamizhaga Arasu Cable TV Corporation on the basis of the representation dated 30/1/2017.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Review Petitioner : Mr.S.Ayyanar Prem Kumar

For Respondents : Mr.R.G.Sankar Ganesh for R1 Mr.S.Gunasekaran for R2 and R4 Standing Counsel

O R D E R

This Review Petition is filed to review the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.10545 of 2017, dated 07.06.2017. This Court, in the above Writ Petition, directed the Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable Television Corporation Limited, Egmore, to consider the representation of the writ petitioner dated 30.01.2017 and pass orders after providing an opportunity to all necessary parties.

2. Heard Mr.S.Ayyanar Prem Kumar, learned counsel for the review petitioner; Mr.R.G.Sankar Ganesh, learned counsel for the first respondent; Mr.S.Gunasekaran, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 2 & 4 and perused the records.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent submitted that as per the direction issued in the above Writ Petition, an enquiry was conducted and the representation of the writ petitioner dated 30.01.2017 was rejected on 07.04.2018.

4. Since the order passed by this Court dated 07.06.2017 was considered and disposed of, no further adjudication is required in this case. Hence, the Review Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/ Assistant Registrar(CS-II) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The District Collector, Dindigul District.

+1cc to Mr.S.Ayyanar Prem kumar, Advocate, SR.No.61973 +1cc to Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh, Advocate, SR.No.62106 (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE) Rev.Aplw(MD) No.41 of 2017 and WMP(MD)10152/2017 in W.P.(MD)No.10545 of 2017 & W.M.P.(MD)No.4349 of 2018 RNS KK/SV MMS/20.04.2018/SAR-2/2P-4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/