Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12952/2021dismissed

Soundarraj v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-10-08Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.12952 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08/10/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI CRL OP(MD). No.12952 of 2021

1. Soundarraj

2. Stanly

3. Kingsly ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3 Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Sattankulam Police Station, Sattankulam, Thoothukudi District.

Crime No.206 of 2021. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunraj, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :-For Anticipatory bail in Crime No.206 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 427 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.206 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 14.08.2021, the petitioners damaged the compound wall of the defacto complainant's house and abused him in filthy language. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocents, they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution, but they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that it is a case of case in counter. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.12952 of 2021

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent has produced the photographs for the incidents took place, which reveals that the petitioners have damaged the entire house and the compound wall of the defacto complainant.

5. It appears that at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are intending to restore the compound wall, this Court granted some time to the petitioners for restoring the compound wall. But, they have not taken any steps to restore the compound wall, though this Court granted some time.

6. Considering the conduct and attitude of the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

sd/- 08/10/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATTANKULAM POLICE STATION, SATTANKULAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12952 of 2021 Date :08/10/2021 SSB MK/SKN/SAR.III/21.10.2021/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2