← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9463/2026allowed

Jeyadinesh v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2026-05-29Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 29.05.2026 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR Jeyadinesh : Petitioner/ Accused Rank not known Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District.

(Crime No.123 of 2026) : Respondent/ Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Chandrasekar, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.D.Venkatesh, Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.

PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.123 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent police.

1/6

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.123 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that there existed civil dispute between the petitioner and the complainant's husband due to which, the petitioner had attacked the defacto complainant's husband and abused him in filthy language. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner is not having any bad antecedents. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the injured was already discharged from the hospital.

2/6

5.Considering the facts that there existed civil dispute between the parties, that the injured was already discharged from the hospital; that except the offences under Sections 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, all other offences are bailable in nature and that the petitioner is not having any previous case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

3/6

[b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS, 2023. (K M S J) 29.05.2026 DAS 4/6

TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J DAS

ORDER

IN Date : 29.05.2026 6/6