Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/10352/2019allowed

Vibin Kumar Antony v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-12-11Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10352 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10352 of 2019 Vibin Kumar Anthony ... Petitioner/sole Accused Vs.

1. State rep by its The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kanyakumari, Kanyakumari District. ... 1st Respondent/Complainant In Crime No.11 of 2018 2.Arockiya Stelina ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in Crime No.11 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.T.Ramesh Raja For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan, Additional Public Prosecutor.

For R2 : Mr.R.Pon Karthikeyan

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.11 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent 2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioner/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the complaint and therefore, the petitioner would pray for quashing the FIR in Crime No.11 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent police. 3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally present before this Court today(11.12.2020) and the defacto complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10352 of 2019 their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the FIR in Crime No.11 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Note In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

Encl: Xerox copy of Joint Compromise Memo To 1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kanyakumari, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to Mr.P.T.RAMESH RAJA, Advocate (SR-25380[F] dated 14/12/2020 ) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10352 of 2019 11.12.2020 VB (31.12.2020) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2