← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16724/2018ordered

Satham Hussain, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2018-09-24Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of September Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.16724 of 2018 1 SATHAM HUSSAIN 2 YASAR ARAFATH ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.3 & 4 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIURPPALAIKUDI POLICE STATION, IN CR.NO.88 OF 2018 RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.R.MURUGAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.V.NEELAKANDAN ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 342, 332, 324 and 307 I.P.C in Crime No.88 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that when the petitioners and others were taking food in the hotel, at that time, there was some altercation between the petitioners and the suppliers in the hotel. Hence, the complaint.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 24/09/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO I RAMANATHAPURAM 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIURPPALAIKUDI POLICE STATION, RAMNAD DT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.R.MURUGAN Advocate SR.No.18074

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16724 of 2018 Date :24/09/2018 MSI/JC/SAR-I/28.09.2018-2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/