← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9808/2025allowed

Sinthuja v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Cheranmahadevi

2025-06-12Honourable Mr Justice P.Vadamalai5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 12/06/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI Sinthuja, S/o.Ramakrishnan ... Petitioner/A2 Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Cheranmahadevi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.256 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.C.Susikumar, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.Prakash, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.256 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A2, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent 1/5

police for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 296(b), 74 and 351(2) of BNS, 2023 r/w. Section 4 of TNPHW Act, 2002 in Crime No.256 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant namely Muthumari is that due to money dispute pending between the accused and the defacto complainant, on 20.05.2025 at about 10.15 a.m., the 1st accused trespassed into her house and abused by using filthy language. When the defato complainant informed the incident to the petitioner over the phone, she has also supported the 1st accused. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and she has been falsely implicated in this case. He however submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that there are two accused persons in this case and the petitioner has been arrayed as A2. A1 is still absconding. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, he fairly concedes that no one sustained injury. 2/5

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and taking into account of the fact that no one sustained injury and also considering the fact as the date of FIR is 23.05.2025, by this time most of the investigation might have been completed, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi and on further conditions that: (a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b) the petitioner shall furnish his residential address and contact number to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi. In the event of any change in his residential address, the petitioner shall report the same to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi;

3/5

(c) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

(d) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023.

sd/- 12/06/2025 / TRUE COPY / /06/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (CS-I/II/III/IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

4/5

MAC TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHERANMAHADEVI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI. 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHERANMAHADEVI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.C.SUSIKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-6291[I] dated 13/06/2025 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9808 of 2025 Date :12/06/2025 PR/24.06 .2025 5P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5