Madras High CourtWP(MD)/16458/2020closed

Mary Elizabeth Shanthi v. The Superintendent Of Police

2020-11-23Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

W.P(MD)No.16458 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU W.P(MD)No.16458 of 2020 Mary Elizabeth Shanthi .. Petitioner Versus.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

3.Jayanthi .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 17.10.2020.

For Petitioner : Mr.I.Sam Jegan For Respondents : Mr.R.Srinivasan Government Advocate, for R1 and R2.

O R D E R

This Writ Petition is filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 17.10.2020.

2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the official respondents.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, on instructions, would submit that on the representation of the petitioner, enquiry was conducted and since there was a civil dispute, the complaint was closed, by directing the parties to approach the Civil forum.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P(MD)No.16458 of 2020 4.Recording the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate, this Writ Petition is closed. However, the parties are directed to approach the concerned forum.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P & A) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) das Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

W.P(MD)No.16458 of 2020 23.11.2020 VR(CO) NR (04/12/2020) 2P : 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2