Raja @ Skv Rajasekaran v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Kattuputhur

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 12.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

1. Raja @ SKV Rajasekaran

2. Arivu @ SKV Arivalagan

...Petitioners/Accused

Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kattuputhur Police Station, Trichy (Crime No.120 of 2026)

...Respondent

For Petitioners : Mr.Ramsundar Vijayraj For Intervenor : Mr. G.Gnanagurunathan For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.120 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6

The petitioners/A1 and A2, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS and Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.120 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 23.04.2026 at about 7.45 pm.,the accused persons criminally trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant with deadly weapons and abused him filthy language and also assaulted him. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and a false case has been foisted against them. The petitioners have nothing to do with the alleged crime. He would further submit that injured has been discharged from the hospital. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the intervenor would submit that the accused persons are having so many previous cases and they are history sheet rowdy elements, hence he objected to grant anticipatory bail to to the petitioners.

2/6

5. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) would submit that the accused persons trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant with deadly weapons and abused him filthy language and also assaulted him. He would further submit that so many previous cases are pending against the petitioners. Hence, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

7. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the considering the nature of offences and also the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and also the fact that it is a disputebetween the family members and the neighbors and though the petitioners have some previous cases all those cases are not similar kind of offence and in those cases they were granted bail and also considering all other factors. this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

[a] Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made 3/6

ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thottiyam on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[b] the petitioners shall report before the Senthamangalam Police Station, Namakkal District daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of thirty days.

[c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala 4/6

[(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

(P D B J) 12.06.2026 aav To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thottiyam 2.The Inspector of Police, Kattuputhur Police Station, Trichy

3. The Inspector of Police Senthamangalam Police Station, Namakkal District 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P. DHANABAL, J aav

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No. 9546 of 2026 Date : 12.06.2026 6/6