Veera Manikandan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thiruppuvanam
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20/05/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
1. Veera Manikandan,
2. Surya Prasanth,
3. Sudharsan, ... Petitioners/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Thiruppuvanam Police Station, Sivagangai District.
Cr.No.241 of 2026.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nihar Ali, For Respondent : Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.241/2026 on the file of the respondent Police 1/6
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.241 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on due to previous enmity between the parties, the petitioners abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and their names have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) fairly submits that the petitioners and the defacto complainant are close relatives and due to wordy quarrel between the defacto complainant and the 2/6
petitioners, the occurrence happened and also the petitioners have no previous case. However, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioners and considering the relationship between the parties and no previous case is pending against the petitioners, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
7.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruppuvanam, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready and on further conditions that:
3/6
[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure heir identity;
[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police once in a week i.e., on every Monday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders;
[c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature.
[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. 4/6
[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
(R V J) 20.05.2026 TTA TO
1. The Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruppuvanam.
2. Inspector of Police, Thiruppuvanam Police Station, Sivagangai District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J TTA
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.9557 of 2026 Date : 20/05/2026 6/6