Murugan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twentieth day of September Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.16902 of 2018 MURUGAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED(SINGLE) Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEW- DINDIGUL POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

IN CRIME NO.928 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.R.ANAND Advocate For Respondent : Mr.V.NEELAKANDAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is in judicial custody since 11.09.2018 for the offence punishable under Sections 4(1)(a) and 4(1-A) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act in Crime No.928 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police. He seeks bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the occurrence took place on 11.09.2018 for which pursuant to a complaint given by the respondent police, F.I.R. was registered on the same day itself wherein he would allege that on the date of occurrence along with his police party, on receipt an information has made a search on the house of the petitioner in which he found that the petitioner was in possession of 120 numbers of brandy bottles in which each of the bottle contained 180 ml. of alcoholic liquor. After opening of one of the bottle, as there was an emanation of a bad odor, he came to an impression that probably the petitioner might have put certain poisons substance which made him to register an F.I.R. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that no previous case is pending against the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner from

11.09.2018. As such, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to the following conditions:

(i) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul District. (ii)the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation; sd/- 20/09/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3. THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT JAIL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEW- DINDIGUL POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.R.ANAND Advocate SR.No.18017

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16902 of 2018 Date :20/09/2018 MS/VR-MMS/SAR-4/20.09.2018/2P.7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/