C.Veeresan, v. The Managing Director,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.08.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P(MD).No.15469 of 2016 C.Veeresan ...

Petitioner Vs 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

3.The Administrative Officer, The Tamil Nadu State Transport Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvallur House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the retirement benefits to the petitioner in view of the representation dated 09.08.2016.

For petitioner : Mr.D.Senthil For R.1 and R.2 : Mr.D.Sivaraman For R.3 : Mr.A.P.Muthupandian

ORDER

The petitioner was an employee of the respondents/ Transport Corporation. Seeking a direction for grant of terminal benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents have not disbursed the benefits both under the Settlement and as per the Government Order. In this regard, the petitioner has given a representation to the respondents. Since the same did not evoke any response, the petitioner is before this Court.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. At this juncture, learned Standing Counsel for the Transport Corporation, after taking notice for the respondents, submitted that in similar circumstances, this Court, in W.P.(MD). No.4829 of 2016, dated 10.03.2016, has directed the respondents therein to consider the representations of those petitioners. Therefore, he submitted that a similar direction may be issued in these petitions also.

4.

In view of the above, the respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, on merits and in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is also directed to once again send the representation to the respondents by enclosing a copy of this order, for further follow up, in this regard.

5.

With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar + 1 CC TO Mr.D.SENTHIL, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 46991 + 1 CC TO Mr.D.SIVARAMAN, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 47095 VS TE/GSV-PM : 27/09/2016 : 2P/3C W.P(MD).No.15469 of 2016 23.08.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/