Vinoth, S/O.Arun, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Sixth day of September Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.16973 of 2018 VINOTH ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ECONOMIC OFFENCE WING, UNIT II, VIRUDHUANGAR.

Crime No.4 of 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.R.MARIAPPAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.V.NEELAKANDAN Additional Purblic Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406,420,120(b) of IPC and Section 5 of TNPID Act in Crime No.4 of 2016 seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused have given false promise of giving higher interest for the depositors. Based on which the petitioner had deposited some money and on maturity, the petitioner failed to return the money. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. 4 .The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner's company collected money and the investigation is at the initial stage. 5 .Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

learned Special Judge for TNPID Act Cases, Madurai and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 26/09/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TNPID ACT CASES, MADURAI.

2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ECONOMIC OFFENCE WING, UNIT II, VIRUDHUANGAR.

3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.R.MARIAPPAN Advocate SR.No.18289

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16973 of 2018 Date :26/09/2018 PS/RR/SAR.4/03.10.2018/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/