S.Muthupandi v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Allinagaram
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20.05.2026 PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR CRL OP(MD).No.9747 of 2026 S.Muthupandi S/o. Subramani
...Petitioner/Sole Accused
Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Allinagaram Police Station, Theni District.
Crime No.201 of 2026.
...Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Thirumurugan Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No.201 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. 1/6
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.04.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1), 62 and 64 of BNS in Crime No.201 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 07.04.2026, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint against the petitioner, stating that while she was working at a brick kiln, she had gone to the roadside to attend to her natural call, at that time the petitioner misbehaved with her and attempted to commit rape. Hence the case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.04.2026 and he has been in custody for more than 42 days. Hence, he has prayed for the grant of bail.
2/6
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that the investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature and hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, nature of offence, and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Additional Mahila Court, Theni, and on further conditions that: 3/6
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Monday at 10.30a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected;
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
4/6
[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.
(R V J) 20.05.2026 gvn To 1.The Additional Mahila Court, Theni.
2.The Inspector of Police, Allinagaram Police Station, Theni District.
3. The Officer-in-Charge, Sub Jail, Periyakulam.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
gvn
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.9747 of 2026 Date : 20.05.2026 6/6