Madras High CourtWP(MD)/4882/2017disposed of

A.Jeevarathinam v. The Principal District Judge

2017-03-22Honourable Mr Justice T. S. Sivagnanam,Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.03.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN W.P.[MD].No.4882 of 2017 A.Jeevarathinam : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram.

2.The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Returned Order Nil, dated 10.02.2017 passed by the second respondent and quash the same, consequently, directing the respondents to provide duty as Watchman, by treating the petitioner as a regular duty and pay salary to the petitioner during the period of medical leave from 19.11.2016 to till date.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondents : Mr.N.Mohideen Basha Standing Counsel

O R D E R

*********** [Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel, who accepts notice for the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission.

2. The petitioner seeks to quash the impugned note of the second respondent dated 10.02.2017, which is not an order and therefore, it is not a justiciable and the impugned note states https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

that the petitioner should approach the Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram. Therefore, the Writ Petition is not maintainable. Be that as it may, the Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram, has issued a memorandum dated 16.03.2017, directing the petitioner to join duty as Watchman in the second respondent Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to join duty, as per the said order.

3. In view of the above, there is no further order necessary in the Writ Petition. Hence, recording the proceedings of the Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram, dated 16.03.2017, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-1) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram.

2.The District-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District.

NB VB/SV/MMS/SAR3/07.04.2017/2P/3C ORDER MADE IN W.P.[MD].No.4882 of 2017 22.03.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/