← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/20119/2018disposed of

T.Manimekalai v. The Superintendent Of Police

2018-09-20Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.09.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD)No.20119 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD)No.17864 of 2018 T.Manimekalai ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Pasupathipalaiyam Police Station, Karur District.

3.Thirumoorthy ... Respondents PRAYER:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first and second respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and her husband namely Veerasankar S/o Lakshmanan and his family members and consequently, direct the respondents No.1 and 2 to forbear the third respondent and his henchman from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful matrimonial life. For Petitioner: Mr.T.Thirumurugan For R1 & R2 : Mr.B.Bhagawathi Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.M.Bindran

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking for a police protection to the petitioner and her husband namely Veerasankar. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there was a inter-caste marriage between the petitioner and one Veerasankar. The third respondent is the father of the petitioner. Ever since the marriage, there has been a serious life threat to the petitioner and her husband and they are not even allowed to enter into the village. A complaint has also been https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

given by the petitioner in this regard on 17.09.2018. 3.The learned counsel for the third respondent would submit that the parties can be made to appear before the police station in order to resolve the dispute.

4.The second respondent is directed to call the parties for an enquiry and give sufficient instructions on the complaint made by the petitioner after hearing both the parties. It is made clear that the second respondent shall ensure that no threat or violence takes place in this case between the parties. If inspite of instructions, any of the parties indulge in violence, immediate action shall be taken against them in accordance with law.

5.With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) To 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Pasupathipalaiyam Police Station, Karur District.

+1 CC To MR.T.THIRUMURUGAN, Advocate SR. NO.85994 +1 CC TO The Special Government Pleader SR.NO. 86212 W.P.(MD)No.20119 of 2018 20.09.2018 TR/SV/SAR-I(28.09.2018)2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/