← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11334/2023dismissed

Lalitha v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-06-23Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.11334 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 23/06/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.11334 of 2023

1. LALITHA,

2. SARANYA,

3. SARATHKUMAR, ... PETITIONERS/ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.3, 6 & 7 VS THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADIPATTY POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.145 OF 2023).

... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/s.Pitchai Muthu.M, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.145 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148 and 302 IPC, in Crime No.145 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity between the first accused and the defacto complainant, the first accused along with other accused, including the petitioners said to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.11334 of 2023 have abused the deceased and also attacked him brutally and caused injuries due to which he succumbed to the injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. Heard both side and perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

4. It is seen that there are totally eight accused in this case and the petitioners herein are arrayed as A3,6 and 7. Even according to the case of prosecution they had attacked the deceased with stones and sticks and caused his death. Further it is case of 302 of IPC and custodial interrogation of the petitioners is very much required in this case. That apart earlier application for anticipatory bail was dismissed by this Court on 18.05.2023 and there is no change in circumstances of the case to consider the present petition for bail, hence this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. In the result the petition stands dismissed. sd/- 23/06/2023 / TRUE COPY / /07/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

AAV TO

1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADIPATTY POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11334 of 2023 Date :23/06/2023 SI(04.07.2023)2P/ 3C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2