Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/968/2020dismissed as withdrawal

Sunder Raj v. Joseph Raj

2021-12-15Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha2 pages

C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.968 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.12.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.968 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD) No.6388 of 2020 1.Sunder Raj 2.Russel Raj .. Petitioners -vs1.Josephraj Ponnachi (Died) .. Respondent/Plaintiff 2.Raja Bai 3.Dora Mary 4.Mary Stella 5.Arloo 6.Prasad 7.Amalin Sudha 8.Thankaraj 9.Radha Devi 10.Swornam .. Respondents/Defendants 3 to 12 Prayer :- Petition filed under Section 115 Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 14.10.2020 passed in E.P.No.6/2020 in O.S.No.284/2001 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram.

For Petitioners :

Mr.R.Govindaraj For Respondents :

Mr.G.Cenil ******

ORDER

Mr.R.Govindaraj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, would submit that nothing survives for consideration in this Civil Revision Petition, as the petitioners have succeeded in the Second Appeal in S.A.No.1029 of 2006. Therefore, he seeks to withdraw the petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.968 of 2020 2.This Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn on the basis of the representation made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the virtual court. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) abr Note:- In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

To The Principal District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram.

C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.968 of 2020 Dated: 15.12.2021 USK (23.12.2021) 2P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2