Thiruppathi v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Mannachanallur

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20/05/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Thiruppathi ... Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Mannachanallur Police Station, Trichy District.

(Crime No.192/2026).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M.Suresh, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- C-33 AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.

192/2026 on the file of the respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) & 303(2) of BNS, 2023 r/w Section 4 of the Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, in Crime No.192 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to a wordy quarrel, the petitioner trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and attacked him and his sister using knife and caused injuries and jewels of the defacto complainant's sister and cellphone were found missing from the occurrence place. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. 2/6

Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Mahila Judge, Trichy, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready and on further conditions that:

3/6

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police monthly once, ie., 1st working day of every English Calendar month at 10.30 a.m, until further orders;

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions 4/6

have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

(R V J) 20.05.2026 PJL TO

1. The Additional Mahila Judge, Trichy.

2.

The Inspector of Police, Mannachanallur Police Station, Trichy District.

3.

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J PJL

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9670 of 2026 Date : 20/05/2026 6/6