← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16982/2018ordered

Vinoth @ Vinoth Kumar, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2018-09-26Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Sixth day of September Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.16982 of 2018 1 VINOTH @ VINOTH KUMAR 2 SANTHANAMARI @ PERIYAKANDAR ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 & 6 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADAYANALLUR POLICE STATION, (CR.NO.281 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.R.SADAGOBAN RENGASAMY Advocate For Respondent : MR.V.NEELAKANDAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 353, 307 and 379 I.P.C.(Sand Theft) in Crime No.281 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners and other accused had transported the river sand illegally without valid license. Hence, a case has been registered.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the quantity of sand involved is 2 units and the same was recovered. He would further submit that no previous case is pending against the petitioner.

5.In view of the rehabilitation undertaken under the Tamil Nadu District Mineral Foundation Rules, 2017, and in order to curb the illegal sand mining activities, this Court is of the opinion that

the petitioners are directed to deposit jointly a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the concerned District Mineral Foundation Trust, without prejudice to their rights and contentions before the trial Court.

6.Merely, because the petitioners have deposited the said amount, it would not amount to admission of their guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently. 7.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners shall deposit jointly a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the concerned District Mineral Foundation Trust and on such deposit, they are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.

10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

8.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 26/09/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TENKASI.

2 -DO- THROUGH TEH CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUNELVELI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADAYANALLUR POLICE STATION, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.SADAGOBAN RENGASAMY Advocate SR.No. 18362 COPY TO:

THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT MINERAL FOUNDATION TRUST,

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16982 of 2018 Date :26/09/2018 JM/PN/SAR 2/03.10.2018/3P/7C