Peter @ Murugeshan v. The Sub Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of September Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.17012 of 2018 1.PETER @ MURUGESHAN 2.SANKARASELVI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Nos.3&4 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUCHENDUR POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
( CRIME NO. 12 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.M.MOHAMED HANEEF Advocate For Respondent : Mr.V.NEELAKANDAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 366, 506(i) and Section 9 of Child Marriage Act and Section 12 of POSCO Act, in Crime No.12 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the first accused and the defacto complainant's daughter loved each other and they went to marry themselves on 16.01.2018.
Thereafter, the defacto complainant's daughter did not return back to her home. Hence the complaint.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that this Court granted bail to the first accused in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.3676 of 2018, dated 19.03.2018. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent police submitted that investigation is pending.
5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchendur and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.
sd/- 24/09/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUCHENDUR.
2.DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT 3.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUCHENDUR POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to MR.M.MOHAMED HANEEF Advocate SR.No.18160
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.17012 of 2018 Date :24/09/2018 AE/PN/SAR2/28.09.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/