← Library
Madras High CourtWA(MD)/810/2026disposed of

S.Jeyakumar, v. Mohan Rajoo,

2026-05-20Honourable Mr Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy,Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date: 20.05.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA and C.M.P(MD)No.6634 of 2026 1.S.Jeyakumar 2.Anitha : Appellants/Respondents 6 & 7/ Respondents 6 & 7 Vs 1.Mohan Rajoo No.53, PJS, 9/18, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Subang Jaya, Kualalumpur, Malaysia, Rep. by POA Thiru V.P.R. Raghunath 33B-6/1, Jaya Sree Apartment-2, Bharathi Ula Road, Madurai-625 002.

: 1st Respondent/Petitioner/Petitioner 2.The Secretary to Government, Registration Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600009.

1/6

3.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate, Chennai 600 028.

4.The District Registrar (Admin), Madurai South, Madurai 625 001.

5.The Sub Registrar, Arasaradi SRO, Madurai South Join 4, Madurai District-625 016.

6.R.Thyagarajan : Respondents 2-6/Respondents 1-5/ Respondents 1-5 Prayer:

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order of this Court dated 13.05.2026 made in W.M.P.(MD)No.10536 of 2026 in W.P.(MD).No.14123 of 2026.

For Appellants : Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan For Respondents : M/s.T.Kokila Vane for R1 Mr.D.Ghandiraj Special Government Pleader for R2 to R5 2/6

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.,) The Writ Appeal is filed, assailing the order dated 13.05.2026 made in W.M.P.(MD)No.10536 of 2026 in W.P.(MD).No.14123 of 2026.

2. Upon perusal thereof, it is an ad-interim order of injunction that is granted by the learned Single Judge. The learned counsel for the appellants would submit that since the writ petition itself is not maintainable with a prayer to cancel the document belonging to the petitioner, the writ appeal is straight away filed. The writ petition itself should not have been entertained and the interim order ought not to have been granted and therefore, the writ appeal is filed.

3. Per Contra, the learned counsel taking notice on behalf of the first respondent would submit that even the writ appeal is filed by 3/6

making incorrect averments and excluding documents which are filed in the writ petition and material information is suppressed before this Court.

4. We have considered the rival submissions made on either side and perused the material records of the case.

5. The order that is assailed in the writ appeal is an order granting ad-interim injunction and does not qualify as a Judgment so as to invoke Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. Therefore, giving liberty to the appellants to file such application in the said writ petition for vacating the interim order, this Writ Appeal stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

(D.B.C., J.) (R.P, J.) 20.05.2026 sji NCC : No 4/6

To 1.The Secretary to Government, Registration Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600009.

2.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate, Chennai 600 028.

3.The District Registrar (Admin), Madurai South, Madurai 625 001.

4.The Sub Registrar, Arasaradi SRO, Madurai South Join 4, Madurai District-625 016.

5/6

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

and R.POORNIMA, J.

sji and C.M.P(MD)No.6634 of 2026 20.05.2026 6/6