Madras High CourtWP(MD)/5507/2017partly allowed

N.Selvaraj, v. The Superintendent Of Police

2017-03-28Honourable Mr Justice N. Authinathan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.03.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN W.P(MD)No.5507 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)No.4397 of 2017 N.Selvaraj .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Veerapandi Police Station, Veerapandi, Theni District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings dated 16.03.2017 of the second respondent and to quash the same, consequently directing the second respondent to grant permission and necessary protection to perform the cultural programme (i.e.) Adal Padal on 03.04.2017 the eve of Arul Mighu Maha Sri Kaliamman Kovil Thiruvizha at Venkatachalapuram, Theni Taluk, Theni District.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Bethanasamy For Respondents : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, Additional Government Pleader.

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the impugned order dated 16.03.2017 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and also for giving necessary direction to give permission for conducting Adal Padal Programme in the place mentioned therein, by way of issuing a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents. 3.It is seen from the records that the representation of the petitioner has been rejected without any valid reason. 4.Considering the representation given on the side of the petitioner and also considering the fact that the second respondent has not assigned any proper reason for rejecting the representation given by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.

5.In fine, this writ petition is allowed in part without costs and the impugned order dated 16.03.2017 passed by the second respondent is quashed. The second respondent is directed to consider the representation afresh and dispose of the same on merits within a period of two days. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

SD /- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(CO) /TRUECOPY/ SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Veerapandi Police Station, Veerapandi, Theni District.

+1 cc to MR.C.BETHANASAMY,ADVOCATE,SR NO.18309 PS MAS/MR/SAR2:03.04.2017:2P-4C ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.5507 of 2017 28.03.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/