Balamurugan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Puthiamputhur

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 9888 of 2026 Balamurugan

...Petitioner

Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Puthiamputhur Police Station, Ottapidaram, Thoothukudi District.

(Crime No.42 of 2026)

...Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Arun Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 42 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.04.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 468 IPC @ 468, 420, 465, 467, 471, 204 r/w. 34 of IPC, in Crime No.42 of 2026 on 1/6

the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons crated forged document, using the same as a genuine document, they cheated the insurance company, by claiming the insurance amount. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Co-accused only created the forged document. Co-accused has already released on bail. Hence, he prayed bail for the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the offence are grave in nature. The accused persons created fake Insurance policies and asked the victims to claim the policy on the basis of the fake Insurance policies and also asked them to file even MCOP cases before the Motor Accident Tribunal. The defacto complainant is running the Insurance company. On verification of documents he find that they are created by forgery. Investigation is now pending before the Economic Offences Wing. The petitioner has no previous case. Hence, he 2/6

opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, considering the nature of charges levelled against the petitioner, already co-accused were released on bail, and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ottapidaram, and on further conditions that:

[b] the petitioner shall report before the Inspector of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Thoothukudi, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders:

[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the 3/6

commission of which he/she is suspected;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(P D B J) 10.06.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Ottapidaram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Puthiamputhur Police Station, Ottapidaram, Thoothukudi District. (Crime No.42 of 2026) 4/6

3.The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Peravurani, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5.The Inspector of Police, Economic Offence Wing, Thoothukudi.

5/6

P. DHANABAL, J.

TM

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No. 9888 of 2026 Date : 10.06.2026 6/6