P.Krishnan v. The Managing Director
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.04.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR W.P.(MD).No.5742 of 2017 P.Krishnan ..Petitioner Vs.
1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Express Transport Corporation, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600 002.
2. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai - 600 002.
.. Respondents PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the Pension and other retirement benefits from 01.04.1982 to 30.09.1994 in which the petitioner was working under respondent Corporation and in view of the Cutoff date was fixed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in order passed in SLA(C)No.19016/2008. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Royce Immanuel For Respondents : Mr.K.Sathiya Singh, Standing Counsel for T.N.S.T.C., ***
O R D E R
This Writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the Pension and other retirement benefits from 01.04.1982 to 30.09.1994 in which the petitioner was working under respondent Corporation and in view of the Cutoff date was fixed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in order passed in SLA(C)No.19016/2008.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for T.N.S.T.C., appearing for the respondents.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. Mr.K.Sathiya Singh, learned Standing Counsel for T.N.S.T.C., takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the Writ petition
itself is taken up for final disposal.
4. Though the Writ petition is for issuing a positive direction, the learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 07.03.2017 within the time stipulated by this Court.
5. Having regard to the limited scope of the prayer now made by the counsel for the petitioner in the Writ petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court is inclined to issue the following direction:- "The respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 07.03.2017, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."
6. Accordingly, the Writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To
1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Express Transport Corporation, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600 002.
2. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai - 600 002.
+1cc to M/s.S.ROYCE IMMANUEL Advocate in SR. No.19094 +1cc to M/s. K.SATHIYA SINGH Advocate in SR. No.19226 PMU JS/MR/17.04.2017/2P-5C ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.5742 of 2017 04.04.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/