← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17156/2018ordered

Jinna v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-09-26Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Sixth day of September Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.17156 of 2018 1 JINNA 2 ROSHAN SARIBA 3 NASIRA @ NASIRA BANU 4 A.SHAHUL HAMEED 5 SHARMILA BANU 6 BAKRUDEEN ALI BADHUSA ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.2 TO 7 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI.

CRIME NO.30 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners: Mr.S.M.MOHAN GANDHI, Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.ANANTHA DEVI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 406 and 506 (i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.30 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to dowry demand between the husband along with petitioners and the de-facto complainant, the de-facto complainant's husband tried to arrange another marriage. Hence, the complaint.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that the investigation is pending.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, and on their executing a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 26/09/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to MR.S.M.MOHAN GANDHI Advocate SR.No.18306

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17156 of 2018 Date :26/09/2018 MS/VR-MMS/SAR-1/28.09.2018/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/