Madras High CourtWP(MD)/5755/2017partly allowed

P.Chandraprakash, v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2017-04-04Honourable Mr Justice N. Authinathan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.04.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN W.P(MD)No.5755 of 2017 P.Chandraprakash .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Rayappanpatti Police Station, Theni District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 30.03.2017 of the second respondent and to quash the same, consequently directing the respondents to grant permission and necessary Police Protection to perform the cultural programme (ie.) Adal Padal Dance Programme on 05.04.2017 at 6.00 pm to 11.00 pm in the Festival of Arulmighu Sri Manthaiamman Thirukovil at Narayanathevanpatti, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Manikandan For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan, Special Government Pleader.

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the rejection order dated 30.03.2017 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and also for giving necessary direction to the respondents to give permission for conducting Aadal Padal Programme in the place mentioned therein, by way of issuing a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents.

3.It is seen from the records that the petitioner has given a representation and the same has been rejected by the second respondent simply on the ground of law and order problem. The reason assigned by the second respondent is not proper. Under the said circumstances, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.

4.In fine, this Writ Petition is allowed in part without costs and the rejection order dated 30.03.2017 passed by the second respondent is quashed. The second respondent is directed to look into the representation alleged to have been given by the petitioner afresh and pass suitable orders within a period of two days.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Rayappanpatti Police Station, Theni District.

+One cc to Mr.V.Manikandan, Advocate, SR.No.19352 ps RL/4C/2P/SKN/SAR2/5.4.2017 ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.5755 of 2017 04.04.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/