← Library
Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/688/2019dismissed

Subbaiah v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-07-25Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan,Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.07.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI H.C.P(MD)No.688 of 2019 Subbaiah ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Mimisal Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

3.Muthukumar, Inspector of Police, Kottaipattinam Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the second respondent to produce the person or body of the petitioner's son, Ramanathan, aged about 28 years before this Court from the illegal custody of the third respondent and their officials and set him at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr.Prasanna Rajadurai for Mr.S.Muthalraj For Respondents : Mr.K.Dinesh Babu Additional Public Prosecutor for R.1 and R.2

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN,J) The petitioner is the father of the detenu, viz., Ramanathan, aged about 28 years and alleging his illegal custody and detention at the hands of the respondents 2 and 3, came forward to file this Habeas Corpus Petition.

2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Mr.K.Dinesh Babu, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the Inspector of Police, Mimisal Police Station and the Inspector of Police, Kottaipattinam Police Station and on instructions, would submit that the detenu was arrested in connection with Cr.No.62 of 2018, for the commission offences under Sections 457 and 380 I.P.C., and after arrest, he was produced before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi on 22.07.2019 and was remanded to judicial custody and as on date, he is under judicial custody.

4. In view of the above said development, nothing survives for adjudication in this Habeas Corpus Petition. However, if the petitioner is so advised, he is always at liberty to work out his further remedy in accordance with law, before the competent Forum.

5. In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed, subject to the above observations.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Superintendent of Police,Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2.The Inspector of Police,Mimisal Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Kottaipattinam Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor,Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.NA.PALANIYANDI,Advocate, SR.No.77613 ssl H.C.P(MD)No.688 of 2019 25.07.2019 NA (05.08.2019) 2P : 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/