V.Anbalagan,S/O.Viathiyalingam v. The Tamil Nadu State Transport

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.08.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P(MD).No.16423 of 2016 V.Anbalagan ...

Petitioner Vs 1.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam)Limited, rep. By its Managing Director, Kumbakonam.

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Kumbakonam)Limited, Kumbakonam Region, Kumbakonam.

3.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2.

...

Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to grant the petitioner 4th review benefits and to revise his pay in the Post of Checking Inspector with retrospective effect from 01.09.2010 in terms of Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.61, Transport (C) Department dated 30.04.2015 and as per settlement dated 13.04.2015 and further directing the respondents to pay him the difference amount in his salary and to pay difference in his retirement benefits including difference amount in monthly pension, gratuity, leave salary, commuted value of pension and all other attendant benefits payable to him from 01.11.2013 to till date together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. For petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents : Mr.D.Sivaraman

ORDER

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ The petitioner was an employee of the respondents/ Transport Corporation. Seeking a direction for grant of terminal

benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents have not disbursed the benefits both under the Settlement and as per the Government Order. In this regard, the petitioner has given a representation to the respondents. Since the same did not evoke any response, the petitioner is before this Court.

3. At this juncture, learned Standing Counsel for the Transport Corporation, after taking notice for the respondents, submitted that in similar circumstances, this Court, in W.P.(MD). No.4829 of 2016, dated 10.03.2016, has directed the respondents therein to consider the representations of those petitioners. Therefore, he submitted that a similar direction may be issued in these petitions also.

4.

In view of the above, the respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, on merits and in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is also directed to send a copy of the representation once again to the respondents by enclosing a copy of this order, for further follow up, in this regard.

5.

With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar VS +1 cc to Mr.A.Rahul,Advocate, Sr.No: 49345 +1 cc to Mr.D.SIVARAMAN,Advocate, Sr.No: 48915 JAM/DB/16.09.16/ 2P-3C W.P(MD).No.16423 of 2016 31.08.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/