← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/1670/2016disposed of

T.Kumarandi, v. The Secretary To Govt.,

2016-01-27Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27.01.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.(MD)No.1670 of 2016 T.Kumarandi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Secretary to Government, Highways Department, Fort St. George, Chennai.

2.The Special District Revenue Officer, Road Development Project, Tiruchirapalli.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 11.05.2015 and 16.10.2015 on merits within the time fixed by this Honourable Court by dropping the proposal of acquisition of land in S.No.25/1, Appuvilai Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.S.Kumar, Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

Mr.S.Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the Respondents.

2. The petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents to consider his representations, dated 11.05.2015 and 16.10.2015, on merits by dropping the proposal of acquisition of land at S.No.25/1 situated at Appuvilai Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

3. It is seen that the petitioner's land is sought to be acquired under the National Highways Act and for that purpose, a notice was issued to the petitioner on 04.05.2015 calling upon the petitioner to show-cause as to why his land should not be acquired for the formation of Highway.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though he sent his objection on 11.05.2015 followed by another objection on 16.10.2015, the second respondent has not passed any order so far.

5. Mr.S.Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, submitted that the petitioner's objections are yet to be considered and orders will be passed on merits and in accordance with law.

6. Considering the rival submissions made by the respective parties, I only direct the second respondent to consider the objections raised by the petitioner and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court is not expressing any view on the merits of the objections made by the petitioner against the proposed acquisition proceedings.

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar pm To 1.The Secretary to Government, Highways Department, Fort St. George, Chennai.

2.The Special District Revenue Officer, Road Development Project, Tiruchirapalli.

+1CC to Mr.H.Arumugam Advocate Sr.No.4606 +1CC to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.4569 GJM/SKS/RR/3.2.16-2p-5C W.P.(MD)No.1670 of 2016 27.01.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/