Juliet Santhamary v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the First day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.17209 of 2018 1 JULIET SANTHAMARY 2 MARIYA KIRUTHIKA 3 WILSON ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO. 3 TO 5 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MANAPPARAI, TRICHY DISTRICT.

IN CRIME NO.9/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.A.JOEL PAUL ANTONY Advocate For Respondent : MR.V.NEELAKANDAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 494, 498(A), 506(i) I.P.C and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.9 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the first accused and the defacto complainant are husband and wife. The petitioners are inlaws of the defacto complainant. After marriage, the petitioners demanded dowry from the defacto complainant. Due to that, they harassed her. Hence, the complaint.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the investigation is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain

conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai, Trichy District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 01/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MANAPPARAI, TRICHY 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MANAPPARAI, TRICHY DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to MR.A.JOEL PAUL ANTONY Advocate SR.No.18699

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17209 of 2018 Date :01/10/2018 MSI/VR-MMS/SAR-IV/05.10.2018-2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/