Saravanan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Sixth day of September Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.17211 of 2018 SARAVANAN ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED RANK NO.1.

Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEERANUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT (IN CR NO.205 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.A.D.GANESHA MOORTHI Advocate For Respondent : MRS.M.ANANTHA DEVI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 380 I.P.C. in Crime No.205 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and along with another person stole the gold jewels from the house of the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. 4 .The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the stolen properties have been recovered. 5 .Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani, Dindigul District and on his https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 26/09/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PALANI 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEERANUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to MR.A.D.GANESHA MOORTHI Advocate SR.No.18278

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17211 of 2018 Date :26/09/2018 MSI/JC/SAR-IV/04.10.2018-2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/